Machine Learning Engineer Nanodegree

Convolutional Neural Networks

📑   P10: Write an Algorithm for a Dog Identification App

In this notebook, some template code has already been provided for you, and you will need to implement additional functionality to successfully complete this project. You will not need to modify the included code beyond what is requested. Sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header indicate that the following block of code will require additional functionality which you must provide. Instructions will be provided for each section, and the specifics of the implementation are marked in the code block with a 'TODO' statement. Please be sure to read the instructions carefully!

Note: Once you have completed all of the code implementations, you need to finalize your work by exporting the iPython Notebook as an HTML document. Before exporting the notebook to html, all of the code cells need to have been run so that reviewers can see the final implementation and output. You can then export the notebook by using the menu above and navigating to \n", "File -> Download as -> HTML (.html). Include the finished document along with this notebook as your submission.

In addition to implementing code, there will be questions that you must answer which relate to the project and your implementation. Each section where you will answer a question is preceded by a 'Question X' header. Carefully read each question and provide thorough answers in the following text boxes that begin with 'Answer:'. Your project submission will be evaluated based on your answers to each of the questions and the implementation you provide.

Note: Code and Markdown cells can be executed using the Shift + Enter keyboard shortcut. Markdown cells can be edited by double-clicking the cell to enter edit mode.

The rubric contains optional "Stand Out Suggestions" for enhancing the project beyond the minimum requirements. If you decide to pursue the "Stand Out Suggestions", you should include the code in this IPython notebook.

Why We're Here

In this notebook, you will make the first steps towards developing an algorithm that could be used as part of a mobile or web app. At the end of this project, your code will accept any user-supplied image as input. If a dog is detected in the image, it will provide an estimate of the dog's breed. If a human is detected, it will provide an estimate of the dog breed that is most resembling. The image below displays potential sample output of your finished project (... but we expect that each student's algorithm will behave differently!).

Sample Dog Output

In this real-world setting, you will need to piece together a series of models to perform different tasks; for instance, the algorithm that detects humans in an image will be different from the CNN that infers dog breed. There are many points of possible failure, and no perfect algorithm exists. Your imperfect solution will nonetheless create a fun user experience!

The Road Ahead

We break the notebook into separate steps. Feel free to use the links below to navigate the notebook.

  • Step 0: Import Datasets
  • Step 1: Detect Humans
  • Step 2: Detect Dogs
  • Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)
  • Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 6: Write your Algorithm
  • Step 7: Test Your Algorithm
In [1]:
%%html
<style>
@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Orbitron|Roboto');
body {background-color: seashell;} 
a {color: crimson; font-family: 'Roboto';} 
h1 {color: #fa8072; font-family: 'Orbitron'; text-shadow: 4px 4px 4px #ccc;} 
h2, h3 {color: slategray; font-family: 'Orbitron'; text-shadow: 4px 4px 4px #ccc;}
h4 {color: #fa8072; font-family: 'Roboto';}
span {text-shadow: 4px 4px 4px #ccc;}
div.output_prompt, div.output_area pre {color: slategray;}
div.input_prompt, div.output_subarea {color: crimson;}      
div.output_stderr pre {background-color: seashell;}  
div.output_stderr {background-color: slategrey;}                        
</style>
<script>
code_show = true; 
function code_display() {
    if (code_show) {
        $('div.input').each(function(id) {
            if (id == 0 || $(this).html().indexOf('hide_code') > -1) {$(this).hide();}
        });
        $('div.output_prompt').css('opacity', 0);
    } else {
        $('div.input').each(function(id) {$(this).show();});
        $('div.output_prompt').css('opacity', 1);
    };
    code_show = !code_show;
} 
$(document).ready(code_display);
</script>
<form action="javascript: code_display()">
<input style="color: #fa8072; background: seashell; opacity: 0.8;" \ 
type="submit" value="Click to display or hide code cells">
</form>           
In [35]:
hide_code =''
from sklearn.datasets import load_files       
from keras.utils import np_utils
from keras.preprocessing import image as ks_img

from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50
from keras.applications.resnet50 import preprocess_input, decode_predictions
from keras.applications.vgg16 import VGG16
from keras.applications.inception_v3 import InceptionV3

from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling1D
from keras.layers import Dropout, Flatten, Dense, Activation, LSTM
from keras.models import Sequential, load_model
from keras.models import model_from_json
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint

from tqdm import tqdm
from PIL import ImageFile
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from scipy.misc import imresize, imread
from glob import glob
import random

import sys
import cv2
import dlib
from skimage import io

import pylab
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt                        
%matplotlib inline
In [4]:
hide_code
def history_plot(fit_history):
    plt.figure(figsize=(18, 9))
    
    plt.subplot(211)
    plt.plot(fit_history.history['loss'], color='slategrey', label = 'train')
    plt.plot(fit_history.history['val_loss'], color='crimson', label = 'test')
    plt.legend()
    plt.title('Loss Function');
    
    plt.subplot(212)
    plt.plot(fit_history.history['acc'], color='slategrey', label = 'train')
    plt.plot(fit_history.history['val_acc'], color='crimson', label = 'test')
    plt.legend()
    plt.title('Accuracy');     

Step 0: Import Datasets

Import Dog Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of dog images. We populate a few variables through the use of the load_files function from the scikit-learn library:

  • train_files, valid_files, test_files - numpy arrays containing file paths to images
  • train_targets, valid_targets, test_targets - numpy arrays containing onehot-encoded classification labels
  • dog_names - list of string-valued dog breed names for translating labels
In [5]:
hide_code
# define function to load train, test, and validation datasets
def load_dataset(path):
    data = load_files(path)
    dog_files = np.array(data['filenames'])
    dog_targets = np_utils.to_categorical(np.array(data['target']), 133)
    return dog_files, dog_targets

# load train, test, and validation datasets
train_files, train_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/train')
valid_files, valid_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/valid')
test_files, test_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/test')

# load list of dog names
dog_names = [item[20:-1] for item in sorted(glob("dogImages/train/*/"))]

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total dog categories.' % len(dog_names))
print('There are %s total dog images.\n' % len(np.hstack([train_files, valid_files, test_files])))
print('There are %d training dog images.' % len(train_files))
print('There are %d validation dog images.' % len(valid_files))
print('There are %d test dog images.'% len(test_files))
There are 133 total dog categories.
There are 8351 total dog images.

There are 6680 training dog images.
There are 835 validation dog images.
There are 836 test dog images.

Import Human Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of human images, where the file paths are stored in the numpy array human_files.

In [6]:
hide_code
random.seed(8675309)

# load filenames in shuffled human dataset
human_files = np.array(glob("lfw/*/*"))
random.shuffle(human_files)

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total human images.' % len(human_files))
There are 13233 total human images.

Step 1: Detect Humans

We use OpenCV's implementation of Haar feature-based cascade classifiers to detect human faces in images. OpenCV provides many pre-trained face detectors, stored as XML files on github. We have downloaded one of these detectors and stored it in the haarcascades directory.

In the next code cell, we demonstrate how to use this detector to find human faces in a sample image.

In [33]:
hide_code
pylab.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (12, 4)
# extract pre-trained face detectors
face_default_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')
face_alt_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml')
                                             
# load color (BGR) image
img_default = cv2.imread(human_files[500])
img_alt = img_default.copy() 
                                             
# convert BGR image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img_default, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

# find faces in images
faces_default = face_default_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
faces_alt = face_alt_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray) 
                                             
# print number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of default faces detected:', len(faces_default))
print('Number of alt faces detected:', len(faces_alt))
                                             
# get bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces_default:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img_default, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (60, 20, 220), 3)                                             
for (x,y,w,h) in faces_alt:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img_alt, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (60, 20, 220), 3)
                                             
# convert BGR image to RGB for plotting
img_rgb_default = cv2.cvtColor(img_default, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
img_rgb_alt = cv2.cvtColor(img_alt, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
                                             
# display the image, along with bounding box
plt.figure(1)
plt.subplot(121)
plt.imshow(img_rgb_default)
plt.subplot(122)
plt.imshow(img_rgb_alt);
('Number of default faces detected:', 1)
('Number of alt faces detected:', 1)

Before using any of the face detectors, it is standard procedure to convert the images to grayscale. The detectMultiScale function executes the classifier stored in face_cascade and takes the grayscale image as a parameter.

In the above code, faces is a numpy array of detected faces, where each row corresponds to a detected face. Each detected face is a 1D array with four entries that specifies the bounding box of the detected face. The first two entries in the array (extracted in the above code as x and y) specify the horizontal and vertical positions of the top left corner of the bounding box. The last two entries in the array (extracted here as w and h) specify the width and height of the box.

Write a Human Face Detector

We can use this procedure to write a function that returns True if a human face is detected in an image and False otherwise. This function, aptly named face_detector, takes a string-valued file path to an image as input and appears in the code block below.

In [8]:
hide_code
# returns "True" if face is detected in image stored at img_path
def face_detector(img_path):
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    
    faces_default = face_default_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    faces_alt = face_alt_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)

    return [len(faces_default) > 0, len(faces_alt) > 0]

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Human Face Detector

Question 1: Use the code cell below to test the performance of the face_detector function.

  • What percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face?
  • What percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face?

Ideally, we would like 100% of human images with a detected face and 0% of dog images with a detected face. You will see that our algorithm falls short of this goal, but still gives acceptable performance. We extract the file paths for the first 100 images from each of the datasets and store them in the numpy arrays human_files_short and dog_files_short.

Answer 1:

In [9]:
hide_code
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line

## TODO: Test the performance of the face_detector algorithm 
## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
def face_count(dataset):
    count = [0, 0]
    for image in dataset:
        for i in [0, 1]:
            if face_detector(image)[i]:
                count[i] += 1
    return count

human_count = face_count(human_files_short)
dog_count = face_count(dog_files_short)

print(human_count, "% of the humans were detected as default and alt human faces respectively")
print(dog_count, "% of the dogs were detected as default and alt human faces respectively")
[100, 98] % of the humans were detected as default and alt human faces respectively
[58, 11] % of the dogs were detected as default and alt human faces respectively

Question 2: This algorithmic choice necessitates that we communicate to the user that we accept human images only when they provide a clear view of a face (otherwise, we risk having unnecessarily frustrated users!). In your opinion, is this a reasonable expectation to pose for the user? If not, can you think of a way to detect humans in images that do not necessitate images with a clearly presented face?

Answer 2:

We suggest the face detector from OpenCV as a potential way to detect human images in your algorithm, but you are free to explore other approaches, especially approaches that make use of deep learning :). Please use the code cell below to design and test your own face detection algorithm. If you decide to pursue this optional task, report performance on each of the datasets.

I consider it is necessary to warn users about the parameters of algorithms that determine the presence of people in images based on the face and its specific features (eyes, mouth, nose, etc.). Naturally, without a clear face image, they will be ineffective.
Moreover, the analysis, focused only on the forms of objects, will inevitably produce inaccuracies due to sufficiently close in forms of biological species. The project illustrates this fact with quite amusing results with dog images.
Perhaps, an additional color analysis will give greater accuracy in determining humans using faces. For example, human skin colors vary very widely, but within a certain range of colors and they are clearly distinguishable from other biological species.
For the detection of a person without a clear face image, studies of head shapes (which are also very different from other species) and analysis of movements and poses with uprightness, may come in handy.

In [42]:
hide_code
## (Optional) TODO: Report the performance of another  
## face detection algorithm on the LFW dataset
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed

TOLERANCE = 0.6
def face_detector2(img_path):
    img = imread(img_path)
    face_detector = dlib.get_frontal_face_detector()
    detected_faces = face_detector(img, 1)
    return len(detected_faces) > 0

def face_count2(dataset):
    count = 0
    for image in dataset:
        if face_detector2(image):
            count += 1
    return count  
In [77]:
hide_code
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]

human_count2 = face_count2(human_files_short)
dog_count2 = face_count2(dog_files_short)

print("{}% of the humans were detected as human faces").format(human_count2)
print("{}% of the dogs were detected as human faces").format(dog_count2)
99% of the humans were detected as human faces
10% of the dogs were detected as human faces
In [78]:
hide_code
img = imread(human_files[500])
face_detector = dlib.get_frontal_face_detector()
detected_faces = face_detector(img, 1)
shape_predictor = dlib.shape_predictor('shape_predictor_68_face_landmarks.dat')

for i, d in enumerate(detected_faces):
    shape = shape_predictor(img, d)
v = np.empty([68, 2], dtype = int)
for j in range(68):
    v[j][0], v[j][1] = shape.part(j).x, shape.part(j).y

plt.imshow(img)
plt.scatter(v[:,0], v[:,1], c='crimson', s=3);

Step 2: Detect \Dogs

In this section, we use a pre-trained ResNet-50 model to detect dogs in images. Our first line of code downloads the ResNet-50 model, along with weights that have been trained on ImageNet, a very large, very popular dataset used for image classification and other vision tasks. ImageNet contains over 10 million URLs, each linking to an image containing an object from one of 1000 categories. Given an image, this pre-trained ResNet-50 model returns a prediction (derived from the available categories in ImageNet) for the object that is contained in the image.

In [10]:
hide_code
# define ResNet50 model
ResNet50_model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet')
In [11]:
hide_code
# ResNet50_model_json = ResNet50_model.to_json()
# with open("resnet50.json", "w") as json_file:
#     json_file.write(ResNet50_model_json)

# json_file = open('resnet50.json', 'r')
# ResNet50_model_json = json_file.read()
# json_file.close()

# ResNet50_model = model_from_json(ResNet50_model_json)
ResNet50_url = 'https://github.com/fchollet/deep-learning-models/releases/download/v0.2/\
                resnet50_weights_tf_dim_ordering_tf_kernels.h5'

Pre-process the Data

When using TensorFlow as backend, Keras CNNs require a 4D array (which we'll also refer to as a 4D tensor) as input, with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, \text{rows}, \text{columns}, \text{channels}), $$

where nb_samples corresponds to the total number of images (or samples), and rows, columns, and channels correspond to the number of rows, columns, and channels for each image, respectively.

The path_to_tensor function below takes a string-valued file path to a color image as input and returns a 4D tensor suitable for supplying to a Keras CNN. The function first loads the image and resizes it to a square image that is $64 \times 64$ pixels. Next, the image is converted to an array, which is then resized to a 4D tensor. In this case, since we are working with color images, each image has three channels. Likewise, since we are processing a single image (or sample), the returned tensor will always have shape

$$ (1, 64, 64, 3). $$

The paths_to_tensor function takes a numpy array of string-valued image paths as input and returns a 4D tensor with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, 64, 64, 3). $$

Here, nb_samples is the number of samples, or number of images, in the supplied array of image paths. It is best to think of nb_samples as the number of 3D tensors (where each 3D tensor corresponds to a different image) in your dataset!

In [12]:
hide_code
def resized_image64(file):
    img = cv2.imread(file)
    img = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
    return imresize(img, (64, 64))
print(dog_names[np.argmax(train_targets[300])])
plt.imshow(resized_image64(train_files[300]));
Beauceron
In [13]:
hide_code
def path_to_tensor(img_path):
    # loads RGB image as PIL.Image.Image type
    img = ks_img.load_img(img_path, target_size=(224, 224))
    # convert PIL.Image.Image type to 3D tensor with shape (224, 224, 3)
    x = ks_img.img_to_array(img)
    # convert 3D tensor to 4D tensor with shape (1, 224, 224, 3) and return 4D tensor
    return np.expand_dims(x, axis=0)
def paths_to_tensor(img_paths):
    list_of_tensors = [path_to_tensor(img_path) for img_path in tqdm(img_paths)]
    return np.vstack(list_of_tensors)

def path_to_tensor2(img_path):
    # loads RGB image as PIL.Image.Image type
    img = ks_img.load_img(img_path, target_size=(64, 64))
    # convert PIL.Image.Image type to 3D tensor with shape (64, 64, 3)
    x = ks_img.img_to_array(img)
    # convert 3D tensor to 4D tensor with shape (1, 64, 64, 3) and return 4D tensor
    return np.expand_dims(x, axis=0)
def paths_to_tensor2(img_paths):
    list_of_tensors = [path_to_tensor2(img_path) for img_path in tqdm(img_paths)]
    return np.vstack(list_of_tensors)

Making Predictions with ResNet-50

Getting the 4D tensor ready for ResNet-50, and for any other pre-trained model in Keras, requires some additional processing. First, the RGB image is converted to BGR by reordering the channels. All pre-trained models have the additional normalization step that the mean pixel (expressed in RGB as $[103.939, 116.779, 123.68]$ and calculated from all pixels in all images in ImageNet) must be subtracted from every pixel in each image. This is implemented in the imported function preprocess_input. If you're curious, you can check the code for preprocess_input here.

Now that we have a way to format our image for supplying to ResNet-50, we are now ready to use the model to extract the predictions. This is accomplished with the predict method, which returns an array whose $i$-th entry is the model's predicted probability that the image belongs to the $i$-th ImageNet category. This is implemented in the ResNet50_predict_labels function below.

By taking the argmax of the predicted probability vector, we obtain an integer corresponding to the model's predicted object class, which we can identify with an object category through the use of this dictionary.

In [14]:
hide_code
def ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path):
    # returns prediction vector for image located at img_path
    img = preprocess_input(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    return np.argmax(ResNet50_model.predict(img))

def ResNet50_predict_labels2(img_path):
    # returns prediction vector for image located at img_path
    img = preprocess_input(path_to_tensor2(img_path))
    return np.argmax(ResNet50_model.predict(img))

Write a Dog Detector

While looking at the dictionary, you will notice that the categories corresponding to dogs appear in an uninterrupted sequence and correspond to dictionary keys 151-268, inclusive, to include all categories from 'Chihuahua' to 'Mexican hairless'. Thus, in order to check to see if an image is predicted to contain a dog by the pre-trained ResNet-50 model, we need only check if the ResNet50_predict_labels function above returns a value between 151 and 268 (inclusive).

We use these ideas to complete the dog_detector function below, which returns True if a dog is detected in an image (and False if not).

In [15]:
hide_code
### returns "True" if a dog is detected in the image stored at img_path
def dog_detector(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151))

def dog_detector2(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels2(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151)) 

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Dog Detector

Question 3: Use the code cell below to test the performance of your dog_detector function.

  • What percentage of the images in human_files_short have a detected dog?
  • What percentage of the images in dog_files_short have a detected dog?

Answer 3:

In [16]:
hide_code
### TODO: Test the performance of the dog_detector function
### on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
human_count = 0
for image in human_files_short:
    if dog_detector(image):
        human_count += 1
        
dog_count = 0
for image in dog_files_short:
    if dog_detector(image):
        dog_count += 1
        
print(human_count, "% of the humans were detected as dogs")
print(dog_count, "% of the dogs were detected as dogs")
1 % of the humans were detected as dogs
100 % of the dogs were detected as dogs

Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)

Now that we have functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, we need a way to predict breed from images. In this step, you will create a CNN that classifies dog breeds. You must create your CNN from scratch (so, you can't use transfer learning yet!), and you must attain a test accuracy of at least 1%. In Step 5 of this notebook, you will have the opportunity to use transfer learning to create a CNN that attains greatly improved accuracy.

Be careful with adding too many trainable layers! More parameters means longer training, which means you are more likely to need a GPU to accelerate the training process. Thankfully, Keras provides a handy estimate of the time that each epoch is likely to take; you can extrapolate this estimate to figure out how long it will take for your algorithm to train.

We mention that the task of assigning breed to dogs from images is considered exceptionally challenging. To see why, consider that even a human would have great difficulty in distinguishing between a Brittany and a Welsh Springer Spaniel.

Brittany Welsh Springer Spaniel

It is not difficult to find other dog breed pairs with minimal inter-class variation (for instance, Curly-Coated Retrievers and American Water Spaniels).

Curly-Coated Retriever American Water Spaniel

Likewise, recall that labradors come in yellow, chocolate, and black. Your vision-based algorithm will have to conquer this high intra-class variation to determine how to classify all of these different shades as the same breed.

Yellow Labrador Chocolate Labrador Black Labrador

We also mention that random chance presents an exceptionally low bar: setting aside the fact that the classes are slightly imabalanced, a random guess will provide a correct answer roughly 1 in 133 times, which corresponds to an accuracy of less than 1%.

Remember that the practice is far ahead of the theory in deep learning. Experiment with many different architectures, and trust your intuition. And, of course, have fun!

Pre-process the Data

We rescale the images by dividing every pixel in every image by 255.

In [17]:
hide_code                        
ImageFile.LOAD_TRUNCATED_IMAGES = True                 

# pre-process the data for Keras
train_tensors = paths_to_tensor2(train_files)
valid_tensors = paths_to_tensor2(valid_files)
test_tensors = paths_to_tensor2(test_files)
100%|██████████| 6680/6680 [20:04<00:00,  5.50it/s]
100%|██████████| 835/835 [01:47<00:00,  7.75it/s]
100%|██████████| 836/836 [02:04<00:00,  3.88it/s]
In [18]:
hide_code
train_tensors = train_tensors.astype('float32')
train_tensors = train_tensors/255
valid_tensors = valid_tensors.astype('float32')
valid_tensors = valid_tensors/255
test_tensors = test_tensors.astype('float32')
test_tensors = test_tensors/255
In [24]:
hide_code
# trains = train_tensors.shape
# valids = valid_tensors.shape
# tests = test_tensors.shape

# with open('train_tensors.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=train_tensors.reshape(trains[0], trains[1]*trains[2]*trains[3])).to_csv(f)
# with open('valid_tensors.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=valid_tensors.reshape(valids[0], valids[1]*valids[2]*valids[3])).to_csv(f)
# with open('test_tensors.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=test_tensors.reshape(tests[0], tests[1]*tests[2]*tests[3])).to_csv(f)

# with open('train_targets.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=train_targets).to_csv(f)
# with open('valid_targets.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=valid_targets).to_csv(f)
# with open('test_targets.csv', 'w') as f:
#     pd.DataFrame(data=test_targets).to_csv(f)
In [34]:
hide_code
# train_tensors = pd.read_csv("train_tensors.csv", index_col=0)
# valid_tensors = pd.read_csv("valid_tensors.csv", index_col=0)
# test_tensors = pd.read_csv("test_tensors.csv", index_col=0)
# train_targets = pd.read_csv("train_targets.csv", index_col=0)
# valid_targets = pd.read_csv("valid_targets.csv", index_col=0)
# test_targets = pd.read_csv("test_targets.csv", index_col=0)

# train_tensors = train_tensors.as_matrix().reshape(trains[0], trains[1], trains[2], trains[3])
# valid_tensors = valid_tensors.as_matrix()
# test_tensors = test_tensors.as_matrix().reshape(valids[0], valids[1], valids[2], valids[3])
# train_targets = train_targets.as_matrix()
# valid_targets = valid_targets.as_matrix().reshape(tests[0], tests[1], tests[2], tests[3])
# test_targets = test_targets.as_matrix()
In [19]:
hide_code
print('Shape of train tensors: ', train_tensors.shape)
print('Shape of train targets: ', train_targets.shape)

print('Shape of valid tensors: ', valid_tensors.shape)
print('Shape of valid targets: ', valid_targets.shape)

print('Shape of test tensors: ', test_tensors.shape)
print('Shape of test target: ', test_targets.shape)
Shape of train tensors:  (6680, 64, 64, 3)
Shape of train targets:  (6680, 133)
Shape of valid tensors:  (835, 64, 64, 3)
Shape of valid targets:  (835, 133)
Shape of test tensors:  (836, 64, 64, 3)
Shape of test target:  (836, 133)

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    model.summary()

We have imported some Python modules to get you started, but feel free to import as many modules as you need. If you end up getting stuck, here's a hint that specifies a model that trains relatively fast on CPU and attains >1% test accuracy in 5 epochs:

Sample CNN

Question 4: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. If you chose to use the hinted architecture above, describe why you think that CNN architecture should work well for the image classification task.

Answer: 4

I started testing with the architecture recommended in the project.
During the experiments, I noticed that the greatest accuracy is achieved when the number of filters in the convolutional layers exceeds the number of pixels in the input signal by about 1.5-3 times. I tried to add a fragment with more filters, but this did not improve the result significantly but reduced the epoch speed.
Also, I tested the fully connected layers with 128, 256 and 512 units. 512 showed the best results.
The final dense (fully connected) layer of 133 units with softmax activation completed the architecture for the classification task of 133 outputs.

For better understanding of neural networks, I built convolutional and recurrent ones for comparing. As can be seen from the example, at the beginning of the training, the recurrent network gives quite good results, but after achieving 3-4 percent accuracy, the improvement ceases. It looks like the convolutional network can be trained further by complicating the structure and improving the accuracy.

In general, deep convolutional networks or advanced variants of them are used in the most cases for image recognition. There are some important reasons for that in the CNN structure: local receptive fields, shared weights, pooling.
Splitting of input images into local fields with gradual movement from the beginning to the end by a certain number of pixels helps to analyze the input data more deeply.
Shared weights and biases allow all neurons to detect the same features and use the translation invariance of images: moving through a picture of an object a little bit, and it's still an image of this object. And it significantly reduces the number of parameters involved in convolutional networks.
Pooling layers simplify the information in the output from the convolutional layer. They are usually used immediately after convolutional layers. Max-pooling partitions the input image into a set of non-overlapping rectangles and, for each such subregion, outputs the maximum value.
The final layer of CNN is a dense layer (or a sequence of dense layers) to connect every neuron from the last max-pooled layer to every one of the output neurons. Activation depends on tasks (classification or regression).

In [20]:
hide_code
def cnn_model():
### TODO: Define your architecture.
    model = Sequential()
    model.add(Conv2D(96, (3, 3), padding='same', input_shape=(64, 64, 3)))
    model.add(Activation('relu'))
    model.add(Conv2D(96, (3, 3)))
    model.add(Activation('relu'))
    
    model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
    model.add(Dropout(0.25))

#     model.add(Conv2D(192, (3, 3), padding='same'))
#     model.add(Activation('relu'))
#     model.add(Conv2D(192, (3, 3)))
#     model.add(Activation('relu'))
    
#     model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
#     model.add(Dropout(0.25))

    model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())
    
    model.add(Dense(512, activation='relu'))
    model.add(Dropout(0.25))
    
#     model.add(Dense(256, activation='relu'))
#     model.add(Dropout(0.25)) 

    model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))
    return model

cnn_model = cnn_model()
cnn_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_1 (Conv2D)            (None, 64, 64, 96)        2688      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_50 (Activation)   (None, 64, 64, 96)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_2 (Conv2D)            (None, 62, 62, 96)        83040     
_________________________________________________________________
activation_51 (Activation)   (None, 62, 62, 96)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_2 (MaxPooling2 (None, 31, 31, 96)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_1 (Dropout)          (None, 31, 31, 96)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_1 ( (None, 96)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_1 (Dense)              (None, 512)               49664     
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_2 (Dropout)          (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_2 (Dense)              (None, 133)               68229     
=================================================================
Total params: 203,621
Trainable params: 203,621
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
In [21]:
hide_code
def rnn_model():
    model = Sequential()

    model.add(LSTM(192, return_sequences=True, input_shape=(3,64*64)))    
    model.add(LSTM(192, return_sequences=True))
    
    model.add(LSTM(192))  
    
    model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))  
    return model 

rnn_model = rnn_model()
rnn_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
lstm_1 (LSTM)                (None, 3, 192)            3293952   
_________________________________________________________________
lstm_2 (LSTM)                (None, 3, 192)            295680    
_________________________________________________________________
lstm_3 (LSTM)                (None, 192)               295680    
_________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense)              (None, 133)               25669     
=================================================================
Total params: 3,910,981
Trainable params: 3,910,981
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [24]:
hide_code
cnn_model.compile(optimizer='nadam', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
In [23]:
hide_code
rnn_model.compile(optimizer='nadam', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [25]:
hide_code
### TODO: specify the number of epochs that you would like to use to train the model.
cnn_epochs = 10

### Do NOT modify the code below this line.
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5', 
                               verbose=2, save_best_only=True)

cnn_history = cnn_model.fit(train_tensors, train_targets, validation_data=(valid_tensors, valid_targets),
                            epochs=cnn_epochs, batch_size=128, verbose=2, callbacks=[checkpointer]);
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/10
Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 4.87017, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
732s - loss: 4.8818 - acc: 0.0079 - val_loss: 4.8702 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 2/10
Epoch 00001: val_loss did not improve
590s - loss: 4.8691 - acc: 0.0108 - val_loss: 5.3533 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 3/10
Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 4.87017 to 4.81782, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
551s - loss: 4.8510 - acc: 0.0121 - val_loss: 4.8178 - val_acc: 0.0168
Epoch 4/10
Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
531s - loss: 4.7809 - acc: 0.0183 - val_loss: 4.8569 - val_acc: 0.0156
Epoch 5/10
Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 4.81782 to 4.75981, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
526s - loss: 4.7378 - acc: 0.0207 - val_loss: 4.7598 - val_acc: 0.0251
Epoch 6/10
Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 4.75981 to 4.70729, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
533s - loss: 4.6848 - acc: 0.0241 - val_loss: 4.7073 - val_acc: 0.0335
Epoch 7/10
Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
528s - loss: 4.6365 - acc: 0.0278 - val_loss: 4.7208 - val_acc: 0.0251
Epoch 8/10
Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 4.70729 to 4.66509, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
529s - loss: 4.5684 - acc: 0.0341 - val_loss: 4.6651 - val_acc: 0.0395
Epoch 9/10
Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
526s - loss: 4.5205 - acc: 0.0371 - val_loss: 4.7159 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 10/10
Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
528s - loss: 4.4858 - acc: 0.0412 - val_loss: 4.7073 - val_acc: 0.0275
In [28]:
hide_code
history_plot(cnn_history)
In [29]:
hide_code
rnn_epochs = 30
rnn_checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5', 
                                   verbose=2, save_best_only=True)

rnn_history = rnn_model.fit(train_tensors.reshape(6680,3,64*64), train_targets, 
                            validation_data=(valid_tensors.reshape(835,3,64*64), valid_targets),
                            epochs=rnn_epochs, batch_size=128, verbose=2, callbacks=[rnn_checkpointer]);
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/30
Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 4.87429, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
33s - loss: 4.8869 - acc: 0.0091 - val_loss: 4.8743 - val_acc: 0.0084
Epoch 2/30
Epoch 00001: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.8759 - acc: 0.0100 - val_loss: 4.8790 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 3/30
Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 4.87429 to 4.87200, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.8727 - acc: 0.0085 - val_loss: 4.8720 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 4/30
Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.8717 - acc: 0.0106 - val_loss: 4.8750 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 5/30
Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.8704 - acc: 0.0100 - val_loss: 4.8733 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 6/30
Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 4.87200 to 4.86962, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
24s - loss: 4.8697 - acc: 0.0109 - val_loss: 4.8696 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 7/30
Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.8686 - acc: 0.0114 - val_loss: 4.8734 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 8/30
Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.8672 - acc: 0.0115 - val_loss: 4.8709 - val_acc: 0.0120
Epoch 9/30
Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 4.86962 to 4.78737, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.8328 - acc: 0.0147 - val_loss: 4.7874 - val_acc: 0.0180
Epoch 10/30
Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 4.78737 to 4.75119, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.7958 - acc: 0.0189 - val_loss: 4.7512 - val_acc: 0.0168
Epoch 11/30
Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 4.75119 to 4.74686, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
24s - loss: 4.7785 - acc: 0.0154 - val_loss: 4.7469 - val_acc: 0.0180
Epoch 12/30
Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 4.74686 to 4.74659, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
24s - loss: 4.7597 - acc: 0.0168 - val_loss: 4.7466 - val_acc: 0.0180
Epoch 13/30
Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.7532 - acc: 0.0199 - val_loss: 4.8131 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 14/30
Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.7426 - acc: 0.0207 - val_loss: 4.8478 - val_acc: 0.0132
Epoch 15/30
Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 4.74659 to 4.73428, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.7277 - acc: 0.0208 - val_loss: 4.7343 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 16/30
Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 4.73428 to 4.72535, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.7235 - acc: 0.0244 - val_loss: 4.7253 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 17/30
Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 4.72535 to 4.67858, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
24s - loss: 4.6716 - acc: 0.0246 - val_loss: 4.6786 - val_acc: 0.0275
Epoch 18/30
Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.6434 - acc: 0.0271 - val_loss: 4.7160 - val_acc: 0.0192
Epoch 19/30
Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.6228 - acc: 0.0274 - val_loss: 4.7132 - val_acc: 0.0275
Epoch 20/30
Epoch 00019: val_loss improved from 4.67858 to 4.67152, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.6086 - acc: 0.0316 - val_loss: 4.6715 - val_acc: 0.0228
Epoch 21/30
Epoch 00020: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.5801 - acc: 0.0319 - val_loss: 4.6914 - val_acc: 0.0347
Epoch 22/30
Epoch 00021: val_loss improved from 4.67152 to 4.66356, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.5634 - acc: 0.0325 - val_loss: 4.6636 - val_acc: 0.0299
Epoch 23/30
Epoch 00022: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.5496 - acc: 0.0322 - val_loss: 4.6716 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 24/30
Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.5470 - acc: 0.0338 - val_loss: 4.6737 - val_acc: 0.0168
Epoch 25/30
Epoch 00024: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.5206 - acc: 0.0374 - val_loss: 4.7203 - val_acc: 0.0311
Epoch 26/30
Epoch 00025: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.5155 - acc: 0.0374 - val_loss: 4.6779 - val_acc: 0.0204
Epoch 27/30
Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.4939 - acc: 0.0389 - val_loss: 4.6776 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 28/30
Epoch 00027: val_loss improved from 4.66356 to 4.65567, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5
23s - loss: 4.4731 - acc: 0.0404 - val_loss: 4.6557 - val_acc: 0.0299
Epoch 29/30
Epoch 00028: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.4558 - acc: 0.0373 - val_loss: 4.6890 - val_acc: 0.0263
Epoch 30/30
Epoch 00029: val_loss did not improve
22s - loss: 4.4420 - acc: 0.0410 - val_loss: 4.6871 - val_acc: 0.0251
In [30]:
hide_code
history_plot(rnn_history)

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [60]:
hide_code
cnn_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5')
rnn_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.rnn_from_scratch.hdf5')

Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 1%.

In [61]:
hide_code
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
cnn_dog_breed_predictions = [np.argmax(cnn_model.predict(np.expand_dims(tensor, axis=0))) \
                             for tensor in test_tensors]
rnn_dog_breed_predictions = [np.argmax(rnn_model.predict(np.expand_dims(tensor, axis=0))) \
                             for tensor in test_tensors.reshape(836,3,64*64)]

# report test accuracy
cnn_test_accuracy = \
100*np.sum(np.array(cnn_dog_breed_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(cnn_dog_breed_predictions)
print('Test CNN accuracy: %.4f%%' % cnn_test_accuracy)
rnn_test_accuracy = \
100*np.sum(np.array(rnn_dog_breed_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(rnn_dog_breed_predictions)
print('Test RNN accuracy: %.4f%%' % rnn_test_accuracy)
Test CNN accuracy: 4.1866%
Test RNN accuracy: 3.8278%

Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds

To reduce training time without sacrificing accuracy, we show you how to train a CNN using transfer learning. In the following step, you will get a chance to use transfer learning to train your own CNN.

Obtain Bottleneck Features

In [15]:
hide_code
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogVGG16Data.npz')
train_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['test']

Model Architecture

The model uses the the pre-trained VGG-16 model as a fixed feature extractor, where the last convolutional output of VGG-16 is fed as input to our model. We only add a global average pooling layer and a fully connected layer, where the latter contains one node for each dog category and is equipped with a softmax.

In [73]:
hide_code
VGG16_model = Sequential()
VGG16_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_VGG16.shape[1:]))

VGG16_model.add(Dense(2048, activation='relu'))
VGG16_model.add(Dropout(0.5))

VGG16_model.add(Dense(256, activation='relu'))
VGG16_model.add(Dropout(0.5))
   
VGG16_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

VGG16_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_14  (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_45 (Dense)             (None, 2048)              1050624   
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_32 (Dropout)         (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_46 (Dense)             (None, 256)               524544    
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_33 (Dropout)         (None, 256)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_47 (Dense)             (None, 133)               34181     
=================================================================
Total params: 1,609,349
Trainable params: 1,609,349
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [74]:
hide_code
VGG16_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])

Train the Model

In [75]:
hide_code
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5', 
                               verbose=2, save_best_only=True)

VGG16_model.fit(train_VGG16, train_targets, 
                validation_data=(valid_VGG16, valid_targets),
                epochs=30, batch_size=256, 
                callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=2);
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/30
Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 4.84900, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6s - loss: 6.3093 - acc: 0.0169 - val_loss: 4.8490 - val_acc: 0.0383
Epoch 2/30
Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 4.84900 to 4.67498, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 4.8281 - acc: 0.0238 - val_loss: 4.6750 - val_acc: 0.0695
Epoch 3/30
Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 4.67498 to 4.31985, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 4.6865 - acc: 0.0442 - val_loss: 4.3198 - val_acc: 0.1126
Epoch 4/30
Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 4.31985 to 3.88545, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 4.4541 - acc: 0.0731 - val_loss: 3.8855 - val_acc: 0.1868
Epoch 5/30
Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 3.88545 to 3.40373, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
3s - loss: 4.1552 - acc: 0.1132 - val_loss: 3.4037 - val_acc: 0.2587
Epoch 6/30
Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 3.40373 to 2.92430, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
3s - loss: 3.8057 - acc: 0.1542 - val_loss: 2.9243 - val_acc: 0.3437
Epoch 7/30
Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 2.92430 to 2.34449, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
3s - loss: 3.3433 - acc: 0.2157 - val_loss: 2.3445 - val_acc: 0.4527
Epoch 8/30
Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 2.34449 to 1.86135, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 2.9173 - acc: 0.2814 - val_loss: 1.8613 - val_acc: 0.5473
Epoch 9/30
Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 1.86135 to 1.49163, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
3s - loss: 2.4846 - acc: 0.3621 - val_loss: 1.4916 - val_acc: 0.6347
Epoch 10/30
Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 1.49163 to 1.26483, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 2.1319 - acc: 0.4229 - val_loss: 1.2648 - val_acc: 0.6623
Epoch 11/30
Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 1.26483 to 1.05387, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.8779 - acc: 0.4855 - val_loss: 1.0539 - val_acc: 0.7054
Epoch 12/30
Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 1.05387 to 0.99986, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.6420 - acc: 0.5394 - val_loss: 0.9999 - val_acc: 0.7317
Epoch 13/30
Epoch 00012: val_loss improved from 0.99986 to 0.91647, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.4930 - acc: 0.5681 - val_loss: 0.9165 - val_acc: 0.7377
Epoch 14/30
Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 0.91647 to 0.88290, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.3560 - acc: 0.5981 - val_loss: 0.8829 - val_acc: 0.7365
Epoch 15/30
Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 0.88290 to 0.84899, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.2254 - acc: 0.6391 - val_loss: 0.8490 - val_acc: 0.7389
Epoch 16/30
Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 0.84899 to 0.81091, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.1779 - acc: 0.6479 - val_loss: 0.8109 - val_acc: 0.7653
Epoch 17/30
Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 0.81091 to 0.77958, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.0621 - acc: 0.6687 - val_loss: 0.7796 - val_acc: 0.7629
Epoch 18/30
Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.9809 - acc: 0.7021 - val_loss: 0.8022 - val_acc: 0.7605
Epoch 19/30
Epoch 00018: val_loss improved from 0.77958 to 0.76822, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 1.0057 - acc: 0.6955 - val_loss: 0.7682 - val_acc: 0.7665
Epoch 20/30
Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.9303 - acc: 0.7139 - val_loss: 0.7692 - val_acc: 0.7641
Epoch 21/30
Epoch 00020: val_loss improved from 0.76822 to 0.75126, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 0.8509 - acc: 0.7323 - val_loss: 0.7513 - val_acc: 0.7581
Epoch 22/30
Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve
4s - loss: 0.7817 - acc: 0.7507 - val_loss: 0.7528 - val_acc: 0.7832
Epoch 23/30
Epoch 00022: val_loss improved from 0.75126 to 0.73457, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 0.7467 - acc: 0.7618 - val_loss: 0.7346 - val_acc: 0.7796
Epoch 24/30
Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.7333 - acc: 0.7711 - val_loss: 0.7454 - val_acc: 0.7737
Epoch 25/30
Epoch 00024: val_loss improved from 0.73457 to 0.71012, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 0.7091 - acc: 0.7753 - val_loss: 0.7101 - val_acc: 0.7880
Epoch 26/30
Epoch 00025: val_loss improved from 0.71012 to 0.69594, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 0.6681 - acc: 0.7888 - val_loss: 0.6959 - val_acc: 0.7952
Epoch 27/30
Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.6541 - acc: 0.7967 - val_loss: 0.7047 - val_acc: 0.7988
Epoch 28/30
Epoch 00027: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.6221 - acc: 0.7990 - val_loss: 0.7390 - val_acc: 0.7832
Epoch 29/30
Epoch 00028: val_loss did not improve
3s - loss: 0.6091 - acc: 0.8058 - val_loss: 0.7051 - val_acc: 0.8000
Epoch 30/30
Epoch 00029: val_loss improved from 0.69594 to 0.69449, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
4s - loss: 0.5421 - acc: 0.8277 - val_loss: 0.6945 - val_acc: 0.7928

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [76]:
hide_code
VGG16_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5')

Test the Model

Now, we can use the CNN to test how well it identifies breed within our test dataset of dog images. We print the test accuracy below.

In [77]:
hide_code
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
VGG16_predictions = [np.argmax(VGG16_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_VGG16]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(VGG16_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(VGG16_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 81.2201%

Predict Dog Breed with the Model

In [54]:
hide_code
def extract_VGG16(tensor):
    from keras.applications.vgg16 import preprocess_input
    return VGG16(weights='imagenet', include_top=False).predict(preprocess_input(tensor))

def VGG16_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_VGG16(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = VGG16_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]

Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)

You will now use transfer learning to create a CNN that can identify dog breed from images. Your CNN must attain at least 60% accuracy on the test set.

In Step 4, we used transfer learning to create a CNN using VGG-16 bottleneck features. In this section, you must use the bottleneck features from a different pre-trained model. To make things easier for you, we have pre-computed the features for all of the networks that are currently available in Keras:

The files are encoded as such:

Dog{network}Data.npz

where {network}, in the above filename, can be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception. Pick one of the above architectures, download the corresponding bottleneck features, and store the downloaded file in the bottleneck_features/ folder in the repository.

(IMPLEMENTATION) Obtain Bottleneck Features

In the code block below, extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the train, test, and validation sets by running the following:

bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/Dog{network}Data.npz')
train_{network} = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_{network} = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_{network} = bottleneck_features['test']
In [78]:
hide_code
### TODO: Obtain bottleneck features from another pre-trained CNN.
iv3_bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogInceptionV3Data.npz')
train_InceptionV3 = iv3_bottleneck_features['train']
valid_InceptionV3 = iv3_bottleneck_features['valid']
test_InceptionV3 = iv3_bottleneck_features['test']

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

<your model's name>.summary()

Question 5: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. Describe why you think the architecture is suitable for the current problem.

Answer 5:

In this case, we leverage a network pre-trained on a large dataset. Complex deep networks are expensive to train, they try to detect edges in the earlier layers, shapes in the middle layers and some high-level specific features in the final layers. But this work is already done for [Inception](https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/udacity-aind/dog-project/DogInceptionV3Data.npz) model and we have prepared bottleneck features. The task is just to apply the training results.
After loading the bottleneck features into [GlobalAveragePooling2D](https://keras.io/layers/pooling/), we only need to connect the results of the last pooling layer with output variables. I've done it with a series of dense layers and tested them with different numbers of units (2048, 1024 for the first, 128, 256, 512 for the second). Then I've chosen the set with the best results (2048=>256). The final dense layer corresponds to the classification task with 133 outputs.
The success of this model is quite predictable in comparison with the first simple model, since a much more complex structure that captures not only the boundaries and shapes of objects is used, besides the network is pre-trained on a large number of similar images and adapted to this data.

In [85]:
hide_code
### TODO: Define your architecture.
InceptionV3_model = Sequential()
InceptionV3_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_InceptionV3.shape[1:]))

InceptionV3_model.add(Dense(2048, activation='relu'))
InceptionV3_model.add(Dropout(0.5))

InceptionV3_model.add(Dense(256, activation='relu'))
InceptionV3_model.add(Dropout(0.5))
   
InceptionV3_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

InceptionV3_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_16  (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_51 (Dense)             (None, 2048)              4196352   
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_36 (Dropout)         (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_52 (Dense)             (None, 256)               524544    
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_37 (Dropout)         (None, 256)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_53 (Dense)             (None, 133)               34181     
=================================================================
Total params: 4,755,077
Trainable params: 4,755,077
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

(IMPLEMENTATION) Compile the Model

In [86]:
hide_code
### TODO: Compile the model.
InceptionV3_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [87]:
hide_code
### TODO: Train the model.
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5', 
                               verbose=2, save_best_only=True)

InceptionV3_model.fit(train_InceptionV3, train_targets, 
                      validation_data=(valid_InceptionV3, valid_targets),
                      epochs=20, batch_size=256, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=2);
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 1.37420, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
19s - loss: 3.6918 - acc: 0.2283 - val_loss: 1.3742 - val_acc: 0.7066
Epoch 2/20
Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 1.37420 to 0.71775, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
11s - loss: 1.6602 - acc: 0.5895 - val_loss: 0.7177 - val_acc: 0.8048
Epoch 3/20
Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 0.71775 to 0.61613, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
10s - loss: 1.2015 - acc: 0.6852 - val_loss: 0.6161 - val_acc: 0.8168
Epoch 4/20
Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 0.61613 to 0.57764, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
11s - loss: 0.9531 - acc: 0.7347 - val_loss: 0.5776 - val_acc: 0.8335
Epoch 5/20
Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 0.57764 to 0.54048, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
10s - loss: 0.8818 - acc: 0.7445 - val_loss: 0.5405 - val_acc: 0.8323
Epoch 6/20
Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 0.54048 to 0.51326, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
10s - loss: 0.7945 - acc: 0.7689 - val_loss: 0.5133 - val_acc: 0.8503
Epoch 7/20
Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 0.51326 to 0.50250, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
10s - loss: 0.7029 - acc: 0.7946 - val_loss: 0.5025 - val_acc: 0.8347
Epoch 8/20
Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.6595 - acc: 0.7996 - val_loss: 0.5122 - val_acc: 0.8443
Epoch 9/20
Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 0.50250 to 0.49453, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
10s - loss: 0.6221 - acc: 0.8153 - val_loss: 0.4945 - val_acc: 0.8479
Epoch 10/20
Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
8s - loss: 0.6083 - acc: 0.8115 - val_loss: 0.5023 - val_acc: 0.8443
Epoch 11/20
Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
8s - loss: 0.5861 - acc: 0.8166 - val_loss: 0.5144 - val_acc: 0.8359
Epoch 12/20
Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.5122 - acc: 0.8377 - val_loss: 0.5189 - val_acc: 0.8467
Epoch 13/20
Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.5000 - acc: 0.8440 - val_loss: 0.5037 - val_acc: 0.8563
Epoch 14/20
Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.4789 - acc: 0.8530 - val_loss: 0.5270 - val_acc: 0.8431
Epoch 15/20
Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 0.49453 to 0.48955, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5
13s - loss: 0.4395 - acc: 0.8617 - val_loss: 0.4895 - val_acc: 0.8527
Epoch 16/20
Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
10s - loss: 0.4288 - acc: 0.8651 - val_loss: 0.5159 - val_acc: 0.8527
Epoch 17/20
Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
10s - loss: 0.4007 - acc: 0.8747 - val_loss: 0.5279 - val_acc: 0.8443
Epoch 18/20
Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
10s - loss: 0.3869 - acc: 0.8744 - val_loss: 0.5302 - val_acc: 0.8563
Epoch 19/20
Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.3631 - acc: 0.8858 - val_loss: 0.5534 - val_acc: 0.8539
Epoch 20/20
Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
9s - loss: 0.3484 - acc: 0.8868 - val_loss: 0.5352 - val_acc: 0.8503

(IMPLEMENTATION) Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [88]:
hide_code
### TODO: Load the model weights with the best validation loss.
InceptionV3_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.InceptionV3.hdf5')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 60%.

In [89]:
hide_code
### TODO: Calculate classification accuracy on the test dataset.
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
InceptionV3_predictions = \
[np.argmax(InceptionV3_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_InceptionV3]

# report test accuracy
InceptionV3_test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(InceptionV3_predictions)==\
                                       np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(InceptionV3_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % InceptionV3_test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 81.1005%
In [90]:
hide_code
InceptionV3_model.save('InceptionV3__model_file.h5')
# InceptionV3__model = load_model('InceptionV3__model_file.h5')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Predict Dog Breed with the Model

Write a function that takes an image path as input and returns the dog breed (Affenpinscher, Afghan_hound, etc) that is predicted by your model.

Similar to the analogous function in Step 5, your function should have three steps:

  1. Extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the chosen CNN model.
  2. Supply the bottleneck features as input to the model to return the predicted vector. Note that the argmax of this prediction vector gives the index of the predicted dog breed.
  3. Use the dog_names array defined in Step 0 of this notebook to return the corresponding breed.

The functions to extract the bottleneck features can be found in extract_bottleneck_features.py, and they have been imported in an earlier code cell. To obtain the bottleneck features corresponding to your chosen CNN architecture, you need to use the function

extract_{network}

where {network}, in the above filename, should be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception.

In [26]:
hide_code
def extract_InceptionV3(tensor):
    from keras.applications.inception_v3 import preprocess_input
    return InceptionV3(weights='imagenet', include_top=False).predict(preprocess_input(tensor))

### TODO: Write a function that takes a path to an image as input
### and returns the dog breed that is predicted by the model.
def InceptionV3_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_InceptionV3(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = InceptionV3_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]

Step 6: Write your Algorithm

Write an algorithm that accepts a file path to an image and first determines whether the image contains a human, dog, or neither. Then,

  • if a dog is detected in the image, return the predicted breed.
  • if a human is detected in the image, return the resembling dog breed.
  • if neither is detected in the image, provide output that indicates an error.

You are welcome to write your own functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, but feel free to use the face_detector and dog_detector functions developed above. You are required to use your CNN from Step 5 to predict dog breed.

Some sample output for our algorithm is provided below, but feel free to design your own user experience!

Sample Human Output

(IMPLEMENTATION) Write your Algorithm

In [38]:
hide_code
### TODO: Write your algorithm.
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
def predict_breed_or_detect_human(img):
    species, greetings, breed = None, None, None

    if dog_detector(img):
        species = "dog"
        greetings = "Your breed is probably"
    
    elif face_detector(img)[1]:
        species = "human"
        greetings = "You look like a"
    
    else:
        species = "neither a dog nor a human"
        greetings = "You look like a"
    
    breed = InceptionV3_predict_breed(img)
    
    print("Hello, {}! {} ... {}!".format(species, greetings, breed))
    
    image = cv2.imread(img)
    image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
    
    plt.imshow(image);    

Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

In this section, you will take your new algorithm for a spin! What kind of dog does the algorithm think that you look like? If you have a dog, does it predict your dog's breed accurately? If you have a cat, does it mistakenly think that your cat is a dog?

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test Your Algorithm on Sample Images!

Test your algorithm at least six images on your computer. Feel free to use any images you like. Use at least two human and two dog images.

Question 6: Is the output better than you expected :) ? Or worse :( ? Provide at least three possible points of improvement for your algorithm.

Answer 6: As we can see it works efficiently and really funny.

I think there are several ways to improve the decision.
The first way is simply to build the own complex structure, adapted to a specific task. This type of specification would be able to achieve accuracy close to human consciousness.
The second way is to further study the parameters of fully connected layers and their combinations. For example, an increase in the number of layers with a more gradual decrease in the number of units in each.
The third way is to try to add one more convolution and pooling layers after loading the bottleneck features in order to improve the high-level recognition features, which are related to exactly this set of images.

In [44]:
hide_code
## TODO: Execute your algorithm from Step 6 on
## at least 6 images on your computer.
## Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/cat.png")
Hello, neither a dog nor a human! You look like a ... Basenji!
In [39]:
hide_code
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/flower.png")
Hello, neither a dog nor a human! You look like a ... Boxer!
In [45]:
hide_code
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/me.png")
Hello, human! You look like a ... Borzoi!
In [40]:
hide_code
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/mom.png")
Hello, human! You look like a ... Chinese_crested!
In [42]:
hide_code
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/Brittany_02625.jpg")
Hello, dog! Your breed is probably ... Brittany!
In [41]:
hide_code
predict_breed_or_detect_human("./images/Labrador_retriever_06449.jpg")
Hello, dog! Your breed is probably ... Labrador_retriever!